Sunday, October 19, 2008

Reading Into Colin Powell's Endorsement

Colin's Delusion

Most Americans have a great respect for Colin Powell following his military career and term as Sec. of State during the Bush Administration. Rightfully and deservedly so. Now retired and away from the political arena we should ask if he has changed or if his position is not removed from his former achievements. We are not surprised at his endorsement of Obama.

Unfortunately his reasoning echoes the Obama campaign rhetoric and media slants. It would appear Colin reads the newspapers and watches television. Obviously therefore he is not privy to "insider" information. Moreover, he subscribes to the great promises of the young candidate Barak Obama.

Promises are easily made and often far more difficult to deliver. Rhetoric is easily spoken and rarely throughout history carried out. Colin thinks Obama can give transition to the country and the economy. We may question that thesis because Obama has almost no experience in world affairs, if any. We may question his qualifications to be President of the United States despite his eloquent speaking of promises. Talk is cheap and experience is priceless. John McCain has more experience than either Bush or his father and far more than Bill Clinton.

Colin raises the question about Sarah Palin's qualifications. Sarah's qualifications are not the issue. The more important issue is whether or not Barak Obama is qualified to be President. Obviously a qualified charmer and speaker but not so sure about his role as Commander-in-Chief.

Obama also has paternal links to the theology of a dangerous enemy of the United States. Furthermore, reportedly links to a known bomber during the 1970s. The reports say "bomber" not protester. The Obama campaign would have us believe that nothing of the past matters any more. Everything matters now because the election approaches. The electorate has the burden of protecting the values of this great country, values acquired over the centuries and for which a horrific and magnanimous price was paid by millions who gave their lives and made great sacrifices for ours and future generations.

The past matters greatly as evidenced by our long standing freedoms and for which we as voters carry the responsibility to protect for all succeeding generations. No issue of substance may be taken lightly when we go into the voting booth. Barak Obama is a regretable delusion from which Colin Powell and wishful thinking liberals are now suffering from. The United States of America was not founded on a delusion, nor has it survived by delusion. The disturbing facts are upon the table. Wishful thinking will not change them. Neither will eloquent speaking and smiling faces. When civilization is under attack, throughout the world, we must ask ourselves very important questions. How smooth and handsome was Winston Churchill or FDR? How realistic was their electorate?

Richard


Tags:

Friday, October 10, 2008

Debates & Decisions

The Real Importance of Debates

Presidential Debates have merit beyond our realizations and expectations. Having seen numerous debates over the past 50 years we know debates tell us who is the most eloquent speaker. But more importantly we hear two sides of very important issues. We learn a great deal from the candidates. The substance is far more important than the eloquence and appearances of the candidates. A Presidential campaign is far more important than evaluating appearance or political lucidity.

Over the past fifty years I have always wondered about the merit of Presidential debates because I was certain personality and appearance influenced the voters disproportionately. John Kennedy was the overwhelming winner in the Nixon-Kennedy debates. During the primaries I was surprised that Romney did not fare better with Republicans. My conclusion was that Republicans are far more interested in the candidates experience and abilities than merely participating in a popularity contest. No doubt more Republicans have a "vested" interest in the well being of the country. They have a broader perspective on politics and economics than the electorate at large. For that reason I became a Republican despite the fact that I voted for John F. Kennedy.

Today we are asked to choose between a very experienced Republican Presidential candidate and a lessor experienced Democratic candidate. The latter is a fine speaker with innovative ideas. The former is unquestionably the more experienced in world affairs and particularly the arena of issues confronting members of the House and Senate.

I enjoy watching the Presidential debates because I learn from the candidates. I am now nearly 20 years beyond retirement age and have great concerns for future generations. I also wish to make a contribution and statement prior to the election.

When I make my decisions at the ballot box I will give absolutely no consideration to the candidates looks or speaking abilities with one exception. I will lean towards the Republican side because of the brilliant and delightful personality of Sara Palin. However, Sara's bright mind and smart comments will not determine my decision. Knowing the economy to rise and fall frequently over the past fifty years I will not sell my stocks or panic about another temporary recession. A country having more than 200 million people most of whom are employed makes for an great economic base.

My decision will be made based on one very simplistic idea. Which candidate is best suited and most qualified to fight the war on terrorism and win that war by totally discouraging terrorists from ever contemplating another attack on the United States and or Americans abroad. Which candidate will not retreat from that fight. Which candidate is sufficiently mature to understand the total anhilation the United States and our Allies brought to our enemies during WW-I and WW-II. Recessions come and go for a variety of reasons. Enemies of the United States and the Free World must be vanquished with total defeat lest they appear again and again throughout the ages, effecting future generations.

As for domestic issues it has been said the Congress of the United States, "They in their wisdom", an amalgam of both political ideologies, will bring solutions to the issues of over sight and regulation required to prevent future occurrences. There is no better system than the American Way that brings together great minds, discussion and debate to deal with the problems of democracy.

Richard